www.nbcfund.com

The globalist progressives are angry that wikileaks damaged irrevocably their effort of one world government united against the global warming threat. How to prevent similar leaks destroying future progressive enslavement initiatives, than to delegitamize that venue.

But, can the progressive movement do so by attacking the leaks against the global warming alarmists?

Demonstrably the answer is no.

And yet, to achieve the same result, by first leaking national security information to wikileaks, THEN condemning wikileaks for publishing, the progressive movement acheives it ends, and pretends to be responsible.

wiki leaks is an amazing site i mean it really is awesome. Some of the things they do may be borderline, but in this day and age, i want access to as much intel as possible. The government works for us, not the other way around

So it is important for you, wherever you are, to get intel and risk the lives of people who have taken an oath to defend our Constitution against foreign and domestic enemies... people whose lives are already in risk and this information guarantees their demise?

Do you REALLY think that you need to know this information?

do i NEED to know this info? of course not, i dont NEED to know anything about anything, remember I am a white male, i get everything I want....

but the point is nothing in this is giving away anything that is not already know

on top of that wikileaks offered the government first dibs on the info to go through it, they declined. So in my head it is the white houses fault, not wikis if people die from this


Take the computer security for instance, the same principle applies

when a hacker discovers an exploit on say windows. They will contact MS with the exploit and give them time to fix it (saying its a white hat and not a black hat of course)

IF MS does NOT fix the problem, than he will let the exploit go to the public.

once its in the public, than MS has a fire sparked under their ass to get to work on it.

BUT whos fault is it really that the exploit is out there? The hacker who found it, offered it to MS who didnt listen, or is it MS for not listening to begin with?

From the Washington Post: Wikileaks is a criminal enterprise...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/02/AR2010080202627.html

Jeeper is right, nothing on Wikileaks is news. This is another attempt by the Socialist WH to censor the internet. If they succeed we'll all be happy Orwellian socialists.

The PFC they have in custody is a scape goat for the real criminal in the WH.

This is my point also.

How to destroy/censor the internet while seeming to be patriotic?

First, I condemn any publishing of information that endangers our troops. I dont think anyone can point to me ever aligning myself against them.

But, just like the convenient oil well disaster(worst in history but its mostly gone now) to manufacture an incident ALLOWS the socialists to then manage it.

The globalist socialist slavery movement lost ALOT of momentum due to those published emails on global warming. And that stalking horse may now be dead. But does anyone really think the global socialists would walk away from the mission of enslaving the freeworld because they failed this time?

And how to be effective next time? Maybe by making sure that alternative news outlets dont exist?

Again, Wikileaks did wrong. But I wonder, where did they get all that information. Was it leaked TO wikileaks by progressive activists?